The odd meaning of ‘radical economic transformation’ in SA

The only thing radical about South Africa’s ruling party’s understanding of “radical economic transformation”, a commentator once suggested, is its use of the word ‘radical’. The comment was made a few years ago, when the African National Congress (ANC) was in the habit of using the slogan to describe very modest change. Now it’s back.

In his 2017 state of the nation address South Africa’s President Jacob Zuma brought back the phrase “radical economic transformation” causing nationwide debate. Other senior ANC politicians have done the same.

Have the ANC’s intentions changed?

To answer that, we need to understand why “radical economic transformation” is back on the ANC’s agenda. As with much of what happens in the ANC today, factional politics is a crucial part of the story.

One slogan, two agendas

The ANC has believed for decades that change is needed to speed up black people’s access to the economy. It has emphasised this over the past few years as it became clearer that economic exclusion remains a stubborn reality despite two decades of political change.

Translating this into reality is difficult. The country’s racial divisions ensure that government and business do not share the common goals which, for example, produced change and growth in Asia.

At the time of negotiating and assuming power, the ANC recognised that it could not impose change since this would scare away capital. And it did not develop an effective strategy for negotiating with power holders in the private economy. The result was a gap between rhetoric and detail.

More than five years ago the ANC began talking about a “second phase of the transition” to address social and economic change. Since then its documents and statements have tended to combine radical phrases with plans which simply tweaked what already exists.

And over the past few months, “radical” economic change has become a growing ANC preoccupation. This is not because its policymakers decided this. Rather it’s because its patronage politicians seized on the slow pace of change to justify their continued quest – in partnership with their private allies – to control public resources.

Triggered by the need of the Gupta family, which has been accused of “capturing” the state to protect their interests, they ratcheted up a campaign to paint patronage as a contribution to freedom.

A familiar tale

The story they tell has become familiar. “State capture” is actually the reverse: an attempt to take back a state already under the control of private interests. “White monopoly capital”, this lobby insisted, controls the state and is determined to prevent a challenge by using claims of “state capture” to defame the forces of economic freedom.

As many commentators have pointed out, this is not about building an economy which includes more people but about justifying why some connected people should get their hands on the public purse.

But ANC politicians who reject this ploy cannot simply dismiss it. The patronage group is trying to exploit the idea of economic change because just about everyone in the ANC – and many people outside it – agree that it is not credible to claim that the economy is now nonracial and inclusive. Their opponents must, therefore, acknowledge that change is needed. But they must try to ensure that it is about including people, not enriching a few.

The stress on “radical economic transformation” – and more militant statements on the economy by ANC politicians such as secretary-general Gwede Mantashe and parliamentary finance committee chair Yunus Carrim – are part of this attempt to develop a programme for change which is not about giving a free pass to the connected.

This does not necessarily mean that there is always a neat divide between the two change agendas – some policy documents might mix proposals from the both sides. But the attempt to justify patronage has triggered enhanced ANC interest in change.

More serious than before

Given this background, the latest version of “radical economic transformation” should be taken more seriously than previous editions.

The patronage group’s opponents need to show that it is possible to achieve economic change which fixes the problem rather than using it as an excuse. So they can’t simply talk about change – they must make it happen.

But are there any signs of attempts to ensure radical change?

The details spelled out in recent ANC statements provide an answer. They include plans to boost business opportunities in townships and rural areas, and by using “the Constitution, legislation and regulations, licensing, transformation charters, the national budget and procurement, state-owned companies and development finance institutions, as well as government programmes” which, of course, is fairly vague.

The State of the Nation Address, which can presumably be taken as a statement of the government’s intent, ignored the township business proposals and concentrated on tougher competition legislation and a state-owned mining company (a possible gain for the patronage group).

It also emphasised land distribution and using a variety of measures to boost black business: public procurement, legislation to boost black property practitioners, and the black industrialists programme.

How radical these ideas are depends on the beholder. To some lobbies any attempt to interfere with the market is a threat to its survival. But, for those with a greater grasp of reality, the theme seems to be change which goes beyond tinkering with current ways of doing things, but does not seek to tear up the fundamentals which have underpinned policy since 1994. It also seems likely that the proposals are designed for negotiation and are not final decisions.

The patronage lobby’s ideas would, of course, change those fundamentals dramatically. It would tear up many of the controls which protect public money, from rules which award tenders to the cheapest bidder, through to controls on money laundering to the Treasury’s spending safeguards.

Their opponents propose a programme which leaves all of that in place but seeks to nudge the economy in a more inclusive direction.

The land proposals, for example, may use expropriation – which will allow courts to set the price of the land – but, according to land reform minister Gugile Nkwinti will mainly rely on the Valuer-General, a recently created government office which sets the prices of land earmarked for reform. New competition laws may trample on some toes but are hardly radical in a market economy.

This year’s version of “radical economic transformation”, therefore, has more substance than the previous editions. But it is hardly a recipe for a dramatic economic shift.

And, while the content of government proposals has shifted, there are no signs yet that the lack of a strategy to achieve them has been addressed. All of these plans will remain on the drawing board unless ways are found of ensuring that investment not only continues but also grows. That will require a coherent plan to win the support – or at least the compliance – of economic power holders. Until that emerges, “radical economic transformation” will remain the stuff of policy documents rather than concrete action.The Conversation

Steven Friedman, Professor of Political Studies, University of Johannesburg

This article was originally published on The Conversation.

Related Posts
France pledges economic cooperation with Zanu PF
HARARE - The visiting high powered French parliament delegation has paid a courtesy call on Vice President Emmerson Mnangagwa today (Thursday) where issues of economic cooperation between the two countries ...
READ MORE
Crisis and the meaning of money
Robert Mugabe Junior has the word “melanin” in his Instagram biography. I discovered this when I went to his profile, a little indulgence I allow myself every few weeks to ...
READ MORE
Chinamasa gets another Mugabe slap down, could join list of ‘bookish’ Treasury casualties
HARARE,– It was 1992, and drought-hit Zimbabwe had just a week’s supply of maize left. Cephas Msipa was chairman of the Grain Marketing Board, then the state grain monopoly. For placing ...
READ MORE
Diaspora monies drop 25 percent
DIASPORA remittances dropped by 15 percent in the first half of the year to $387,9 million due to rapid currency depreciation in source markets against the United States dollar. The Government ...
READ MORE
W(h)ither Zimbabwe
Johannesburg - Business executives and economists warn that 2017 will probably be worse for Zimbabwe than the financial difficulties, cash shortages and curtailed access to capital that were experienced in ...
READ MORE
Zimbabwe losing $1 billion a year to corruption: report
HARARE - Zimbabwe is losing at least $1 billion annually to corruption, with police and local government officials among the worst offenders, Transparency International said in a report on Tuesday. Social ...
READ MORE
Monetary policy is not everything
First, compliments where they are deserved. To Urjit Patel for having won the hot seat (he may be foreign-born, but is PIO; so, phir bhi dil hai Hindustani). Along with ...
READ MORE
For Zimbabwe’s profligate government, money does grow on trees
HARARE - President Robert Mugabe’s government announced a late Monday afternoon deal to hand its employees $180 million in 2016 bonuses, only just managing to head off a planned strike. With ...
READ MORE
Technicians assemble computers at the Omatek factory in Lagos, Nigeria. Photo: Panos/Sven Torfinn
At no point in recent history have calls for Africa to industrialize been stronger than they have been lately. Across the continent, industrialization is arguably the most talked about subject ...
READ MORE
The People’s Bank of China has become a little more transparent about its policy regime for the renminbi
To suggest that this weekend’s heads of government summit of the Group of 20 leading nations will not come up to expectation is, if anything, giving it too much credit. ...
READ MORE
France pledges economic cooperation with Zanu PF
Crisis and the meaning of money
Chinamasa gets another Mugabe slap down, could join
Diaspora monies drop 25 percent
W(h)ither Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe losing $1 billion a year to corruption:
Monetary policy is not everything
For Zimbabwe’s profligate government, money does grow on
Why has Africa failed to industrialize?
No cause for complacency over the world economy

Arts & Entertainment

Arts & Entertainment

Where To Stream Drake’s ‘More Life’: Playlist Will Be Available On Spotify And Amazon

17th March 2017 Staff Reporter 0

After a long wait, Drake’s next project, “More Life,” is finally releasing on Saturday. Originally believed to be an Apple Music exclusive, it’s now looking like the playlist will also be available on other streaming […]

Arts & Entertainment

Rick Ross Feuding With Birdman, Nicki Minaj? Listen To New Album ‘Rather You Than Me’

17th March 2017 Staff Reporter 0

Rick Ross released his new album “Rather You Than Me” Thursday and took some shots at Birdman and Nicki Minaj. In the song, “Idols Become Rivals,” the MMG star dissed rapper Birdman for not paying his artists […]